A press release by Amnesty International today criticises Israel’s response to the UN as “totally inadequate” on its investigations into alleged violations of international law by its forces in Gaza a year ago. The full text of the press release is duplicated below.
Meanwhile, an exclusive front page article by Donald MacIntyre in today’s Independent newspaper adds further pressure on Israel for an independent investigation of actions by the IDF in Gaza during last year’s invasion. The article is based on a lengthy report, as yet unpublished, compiled for Yedhiot Ahronot, Israel’s biggest daily newspaper. The report includes revelations by several IDF soldiers involved in Operation Cast Lead, as the invasion of Gaza was called by the IDF. These revelations show that the rules of engagement for soldiers, as detailed in the IDF’s own ethical code of conduct, had in some cases been “turned on its head”, as one soldier put it, referring particularly to targetted killings of people, some unarmed, in areas where civilians had been urged to leave by leaflets. The soldier goes on to say that instead of using intelligence to identify a terrorist, “here you do the opposite: first you take him down, then you look into it.” The policy, the report suggests, is to nullify as far as possible the risk of IDF casualties, but appears to cut across the the military doctrine – adhered to by the IDF code of ethics – that it is the duty of soldiers to run risks to themselves in order to preserve civilian lives.
Read full Independent article here
Amnesty International UK
ISRAELiS RESPONSE ON GAZA INVESTIGATIONS IS eTOTALLY INADEQUATEi
Israelis latest response to the UN on its investigations into alleged violations of international law by its forces in Gaza a year ago is totally inadequate, Amnesty International has said.
The organisation believes that crucial questions about the conduct of attacks in which hundreds of civilians were killed and thousands were made homeless are not credibly addressed in Israelis update to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon.
Amnesty International Middle East and North Africa Programme Director Malcolm Smart said:
iThe investigations undertaken by Israel fail to meet international standards of independence, impartiality, transparency, promptness and effectiveness.
iThe Israeli military is investigating itself and in no way can this be adequate in obtaining the truth and ensuring justice for the victims.i
The 46-page update published on 29 January says that Israel has opened investigations into 150 incidents involving alleged violations of the laws of war by its forces during Operation iCast Leadi, its military offensive in Gaza last year. Around 1,400 Palestinians and 13 Israelis were killed in the conflict in Gaza and southern Israel.
The limited details released indicate that the Israeli authorities are failing to credibly address grave concerns about the Israeli armyis use of white phosphorus in densely-populated areas. Attacks on UN facilities and other civilian buildings and infrastructure, as well as direct attacks on Palestinian civilians, including ambulance crews have also not been adequately investigated by Israel, said Amnesty. Such incidents were reported by the UN, Amnesty and other human rights and media organisations at the time of the conflict.
Malcolm Smart added:
iThere were numerous credible allegations during Operation eCast Leadi that violations of international humanitarian law by Israeli forces caused the deaths of hundreds of civilians, led others to be used as ihuman shieldsi and destroyed or damaged thousands of homes and other civilian infrastructure.
iYet more than one year on, according to the update, only one soldier has been convicted of an offence as a result of the Israeli investigations, and that was the theft of a credit card.i
All the Israeli investigations have been carried out by army commanders or by the military police criminal investigators and overseen by the Military Advocate General, severely compromising their independence and impartiality. The Military Advocate Generalis office gave the Israeli forces legal advice on their choice of targets and tactics during Operation iCast Leadi.
Amnesty pointed out that the military investigations also preclude the possibility of examining decisions taken by civilian officials, who are also alleged to be responsible for serious violations.
The update states that there is no basis for criminal investigations into serious incidents which Amnesty maintains warrant effective and independent investigations. These include Israeli strikes on UN facilities, civilian property and infrastructure, attacks on medical facilities and personnel, and incidents in which large numbers of civilians were killed.
Despite enduring concerns by Amnesty over Israelis extensive use of white phosphorus in Gaza, the update contends that there are ino grounds to take disciplinary or other measures for the IDFis use of weapons containing phosphorousi.
During Operation iCast Leadi Israeli forces often launched artillery shells containing white phosphorus into residential areas, causing death and injuries to civilians. Other Israeli attacks which resulted in civilian injuries and deaths are dismissed as ioperational errorsi although the update admits isome instancesi in which Israeli soldiers and officers iviolated the rules of engagementi. The Israeli government has not indicated that it will ensure reparations – including compensation – to Palestinian civilians harmed as a result of the ioperational errorsi or admitted violations of their forces.
Amnesty research into Operation iCast Leadi has revealed elements of reckless conduct, disregard for civilian lives and property and a consistent failure on the part of Israeli forces to distinguish between military targets and civilians and civilian objects. Israeli forces continued to employ tactics and weapons that resulted in growing numbers of civilian casualties for the entire duration of the military offensive. This was despite Israeli officials knowing from the first days of the military offensive that civilians were being killed and wounded in significant numbers.
Amnesty has drawn a number of incidents to the attention of the Israeli authorities who have not responded to the organisationis repeated requests for clarification on specific incidents.
Malcolm Smart added:
iIn his forthcoming report on domestic investigations by Israel and the Palestinian side, Ban Ki-moon must include a substantive assessment of whether these investigations meet the established UN criteria and are ‘independent, credible and in conformity with international standardsi.
iSo far, it appears that neither of the parties are able or willing to conduct investigations meeting those standards. If this remains so, then the responsibility will fall on the UN to ensure accountability for the perpetrators and justice for the victims – and this must include the Security Council eventually considering a referral of the Gaza situation to the International Criminal Court and steps by the General Assembly to establish a fund for victims who were killed or injured or suffered loss or damage resulting from unlawful acts committed during the war.i
The Israeli update was submitted days before the deadline set by the UN General Assembly in November 2009 when it endorsed the recommendations of the United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict (the Goldstone Report) and called on both Israel and the Palestinian side, within three months, to undertake investigations into alleged war crimes and other violations by their forces.
These investigations, the General Assembly, said, should be iindependent, credible and in conformity with international standards into the serious violations of international humanitarian and international human rights law reported by the [UN] Fact Finding Mission, towards ensuring accountability and justicei. Hamas has yet to submit any public report to the UN.